Pragmatism and Feminist Epistemology both challenge
the view of knowledge as a detached, intellectual activity. Do you think they
are right? How do you think we should think about knowledge? Now that we have
concluded the section on epistemology, write about what kind of thing you think
knowledge is.
I agree with knowledge being a detached, intellectual activity. To me knowledge
can be easily manipulated. The actual fact is that no knows what is it. I believe
in science and that theories can be proved. I agree that some of us will approach
these topics with or without emotions and to me that’s a big factor on why
everyone has a different take on it. Thorough the course of the class I have
been able to see why I believe this, especially on the discussion board. Many
of the classmates in which I respect, approach this discussions about skepticism,
beliefs, knowledge on a personal religious way in which it manipulates that
directions of the conversation. I can understand that having these beliefs will
prevent you from questioning things like god or life itself. To conclude, I like
to say that these discussions have been interesting and most of all, very
challenging.
1 comments:
nicely said, it was interesting to read your thoughts on this
Post a Comment